What Can Radiogenomics Offer to the Uroradiologist? – Results from a Systematic Review
Number:28ESURABS0016
Type:Scientific Electronic Presentation
Authors: Kristine Bærentz Holst, Anne Rix Arildskov, Frederik Jager Bruun, Lotte Harries Hasselbalch, Sine Hvid Rasmussen, Consuelo Borrás, Rebeca Mirón Mombiela
Keywords:Radiomics, genomics, genetic validation, urogenital cancer, survival, prognosis, risk assessment, treatment response
SECTIONS
Objectives

The usage of medical imaging is swiftly evolving from being primarily a diagnostic tool to playing a central role in the context of personalized medicine with the advent of radiomics in cancer patients [1]. Radiomics refers to the qualitative and quantitative extraction of data from clinical images and the methodology used to convert imaging features in a way that supports decision-making [2]. It has mainly been used in the field of oncology for outcome prediction, risk assessment, treatment response, tumor staging, and assessment of cancer genetics, also known as tumor phenotyping [3, 4].

 

Radiomics is motivated by the concept that biomedical images contain information that reflects underlying pathophysiology, and this relationship can be revealed via quantitative image analysis that offers information on the disease microenvironment and the disease state...

...read more

Figure 1: Multiscale quantification provides complimentary tumor insight. Histologic and genomic analysis can provide specific small-scale insight, which is useful for the validation of radiomic results, focused on quantification of spatial patterns of size exceeding image resolution [5]. Reprinted with permission of RSNA.

Material and methods

The systematic review followed the methods described in a published protocol in the PROSPERO register (ID 310058). All original research with the words ‘radiomics’ and ‘genomics’ in English and performed in humans up to 31st of January 2022 were identified on Medline and Embase.

 

Studies were included if: (1) they were radiomics studies with complex feature extraction performed in any imaging technique including MRI, CT, US, PET-CT but not limited to; (2) relevant clinical outcome was assessed including survival, treatment response, prognosis, or risk-stratification; (3) biological validation of the clinical outcomes and/or radiomic phenotype with genetic data; and (4) the study was performed in urogenital cancer patients (Figure 2). 

 

Studies meeting the inclusion criteria subsequently underwent...

...read more

Figure 2: Graphical summarizing of the main characteristics of the included articles in the systematic review [6].

Results

A total of 10 studies were identified and eight met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review (Figure 3). All of them were published in the last four years. As part of the quality analysis of the studies, we identified limitations and biases (Figure 4).

 

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) was the only represented type of renal cancer and was the focus point of six of the included studies. They were all based on radiomic features extracted from CT images and all of them made use of The Cancer Genome Atlas and/or The Cancer Image Archive for partial or total data collection. The ccRCC studies generally presented large study populations (214–520, mean 373) and low to moderate RQS (6–15, mean 12). Five out of six studies had external validation. The most frequent limitation of the ccRCC studies was verification bias (4 of 6...

...read more

Figure 3: Characteristics of included studies. Abbreviations: MFS: Metastasis-free survival, OS: Overall survival, PFI: Progression-free interval, RQS: Radiomic Quality Score, TCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas, TCIA: The Cancer Imaging Atlas.
Figure 4: Limitations and biases of all the included studies of urogenital cancers.

Conclusions

We present an emerging association between radiological features and genomic / molecular expression in urogenital cancers that can be used to explain underlying disease mechanisms and enhance prognostic assessment and treatment response. While genomics and radiomics have been studied individually, the integration of genomic and radiomic data into multi-omics-based machine learning models could provide new scope for precision oncology, which would aid a more comprehensive understanding and management of urogenital cancers. In clear cell renal cell carcinoma, radiomic features show a promising ability to predict genetic biomarkers and immunotherapeutic response. 

 

REFERENCES

[1] Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(12):749-762....

...read more

Figure 7: QR-code with access to the full systematic review: Mirón Mombiela R et. al. (2022) “What Genetics Can Do for Oncological Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Genetic Validation Data Used in Radiomics Studies” [6].

Same Authors as...