| Number: | 28ESURABS0140 |
| Type: | Educational Electronic Presentation |
| Authors: | Kate Carey, Michael Morgan, Evis Sala, Janette Smith, Helen Clare Addley, Sue Freeman |
| Keywords: |
Teaching Points:
-When assessing imaging of the post-partum pelvis it is key to think of the 3 distinct phases with specific complications related to each: Acute (6-12hours), Subacute (2-6weeks) and Chronic (up to 6months)
-It is vital to obtain good clinical information prior to assessing imaging of the post-partum pelvis. The normal and abnormal puerperal uterus can have very similar appearances and thus can be hard to accurately characterise without a good clinical history.
-Imaging allows evaluation of suspected post caesarean-section (C-section) complications. It is...
...read more
Acute phase (6-12 hours)
In the puerperium period the uterus is hypertrophic, the uterine cavity is distended and there is increased uterine vascularity; typically tubular enhancing structures are seen in the myometrium. It is necessary for the radiologist to recognise the normal appearance of the postpartum uterus. The uterus can have a variable appearance in the puerperium and can often have overlapping imaging characteristics with the abnormal, therefore good clinical information will enable accurate imaging interpretation. The uterus typically returns to its normal non-gravid state 6-8 weeks postpartum.
There is a broad spectrum of post-partum related complications which are influenced by the mode of delivery. Did the...
...read more
Conclusion:
Radiologists play an important role in recognising postpartum complications and differentiating them from normal puerperium changes in the pelvis. A familiarity of the typical appearance of the postpartum pelvis across a wide range of modalities can help us differentiate the normal physiological state from the pathophysiological state allowing us to establish the correct diagnosis and provide the appropriate treatment.
References:
1.Eisenkop SM, Richman R, Platt LD, Paul RH. Urinary tract injury during cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60:591–6....
...read more
Same Authors as...